CLOSE

The federal authorities’s $100 million lawsuit in opposition to Lance Armstrong will proceed to trial.
USA TODAY Sports activities

The federal authorities doesn’t need Floyd Landis to testify in its $100 million lawsuit in opposition to Lance Armstrong. However Armstrong has made clear he’ll name his former biking teammate to the witness stand even when the federal government doesn’t.

“Landis will testify about these details at trial — whether or not he’s known as by the plaintiffs or the protection,” Armstrong’s attorneys wrote in a brand new court docket submitting.

The battle over Landis is a part of the newest dust-up within the authorities’s civil fraud swimsuit in opposition to Armstrong, which matches to trial in November in Washington, D.C. The federal government is suing Armstrong on behalf of the U.S. Postal Service and is in search of to recuperate damages for the Postal Service after it paid $32.three million to sponsor Armstrong’s biking workforce from 2000 to 2004.

In an odd twist, each Armstrong and Landis confessed to dishonest as teammates on the Postal Service biking workforce however now are enemies on reverse sides of this federal court docket case.

Landis filed the unique criticism in opposition to Armstrong in 2010 and is working with the federal government as a whistleblower or “relator” after the federal government joined his case in 2013. If profitable, the federal government may get triple its a reimbursement — almost $100 million — and Landis may stand up to 25% underneath the False Claims Act.

RELATED:

Armstrong’s attorneys stated the federal government lately advised them that it would “transfer to stop Landis from being known as as a witness.”

“The truth that Landis doesn’t wish to testify is revealing — specifically as a result of Landis’ efficiency at trial is an element that courts (and the federal government) can contemplate in figuring out the quantity a relator ought to finally recuperate,” Armstrong’s attorneys wrote.

In earlier court docket filings, the federal government indicated it doesn’t intend to name Landis, 41, as a witness at trial and had requested a decide to exclude proof about Landis’ character and motivation on this case. The brand new court docket filings by Armstrong, 45, oppose that request and say his testimony is related. 

U.S. District Choose Christopher Cooper will rule on the dispute earlier than trial.

“This court docket has made clear that the trial on this case is not going to be about whether or not Landis is an effective particular person,” stated the submitting by Armstrong’s attorneys on the agency Keker, Van Nest & Peters. “Armstrong doesn’t intend to aim to make it in any other case. But Armstrong does intend to elicit testimony from Landis regarding the details alleged in his criticism and the problems related to the disposition of this motion. He should be allowed to take action.”

The federal government’s lawsuit alleges Armstrong’s biking workforce violated its sponsorship contract with the Postal Service by utilizing performance-enhancing medication and blood transfusions to cheat in races. It alleges Armstrong then hid these violations to proceed funds, ripping off the Postal Service and inflicting false claims to be submitted for fee.

The federal government doesn’t need Landis’ character points to distract the jury and says they’re irrelevant to the matter at hand. However Armstrong’s attorneys need to have the ability to use proof of Landis’ motivations and character to discredit him as a witness, if obligatory. They stated that Landis’ “monetary curiosity on this case creates bias” and that his “repeated lies underneath oath in prior proceedings is truthful recreation for impeachment.”

Like Armstrong, Landis is a former Tour de France winner who denied doping for years earlier than lastly confessing. Like Armstrong, Landis additionally has been the goal of a authorities fraud case. Landis was charged with wire fraud after elevating cash from donors to struggle a doping accusation that he knew was true.  In consequence, he entered a deferred prosecution settlement to pay $478,000 in restitution to the donors.

The federal government doesn’t need the jury to listen to that.

“Right here, the relator (Landis) is himself soiled and the federal government could have made the strategic resolution that calling Landis would unduly distract from the case,” stated Anthony Anikeeff, an lawyer who handles authorities contract circumstances for the agency Williams Mullen however who will not be concerned on this case.  “As a result of he’s a relator, the federal government is caught with him however could have little curiosity in no matter he has to say.”

Armstrong’s attorneys have argued that the Postal Service didn’t undergo damages due to the doping and as an alternative enormously profited from the workforce’s success.

“Landis can testify in regards to the obvious indifference of USPS staff to the doping on the workforce and the way the workforce’s doping appeared to additional the pursuits of the USPS,” Armstrong’s attorneys wrote.

In a separate court docket submitting, authorities attorneys have opposed Armstrong’s movement to maintain Greg LeMond and Betsy Andreu from testifying. Each have been vocal critics of Armstrong – LeMond as a former bike owner and Tour de France winner and Andreu because the spouse of former Armstrong teammate Frankie Andreu.

“Armstrong’s movement to exclude the testimony of Betsy Andreu and Greg LeMond ought to be denied as a result of each are percipient witnesses to conversations with Armstrong and occasions relating to his use of PEDs and efforts to hide that use,” attorneys for the U.S. Justice Division authorities wrote.

Autoplay

Present Thumbnails

Present Captions

Final SlideNext Slide