CLOSE

The U.S. Justice Division joined forces with former bike owner Floyd Landis in 2013 to sue Lance Armstrong for civil fraud.
USA TODAY Sports activities

The US authorities is placing Lance Armstrong on trial in November for civil fraud however doesn’t need the soiled historical past of biking to be placed on trial on the identical time.

Attorneys for the U.S. Justice Division filed paperwork Friday that urge a federal decide to forestall Armstrong from utilizing an “everyone was doing it” protection at trial when discussing his doping in biking. If he loses the case, Armstrong, 45, may very well be on the hook for almost $100 million in damages stemming from his time as a rider for the U.S. Postal Service biking crew.

MORE ARMSTRONG:

“Though he insists in any other case, Armstrong’s argument actually exhibits that he intends to place the whole sport of biking on trial,” mentioned court docket paperwork submitted Friday by attorneys for the U.S. Justice Division. “To distract the jury from his personal misdeeds, he seeks to current a prolonged and irrelevant 125-year historical past of doping in biking, detailing, for instance, long-deceased Tour de France riders’ reported use of heroin within the 1890s or amphetamines within the 1950s, and different non-USPS crew riders’ use of EPO within the early 1990s.”

The federal government is suing Armstrong on behalf of the U.S. Postal Service after the Postal Service paid $32.three million to sponsor Armstrong’s biking crew from 2000 to 2004. The federal government says the biking crew violated its sponsorship contract with the Postal Service through the use of banned medicine and blood transfusions to cheat in races. It additionally alleges Armstrong hid these violations by mendacity about them, successfully inflicting false claims to be submitted to the Postal Service to proceed cost.

To maintain the concentrate on Armstrong alone, the federal government desires U.S. District Decide Christopher Cooper to exclude proof of performance-enhancing drug use by cyclists on different groups.  The federal government’s arguments have been filed Friday in response to Armstrong’s efforts to permit an even bigger image of the game’s doping tradition to be offered at trial. Cooper will rule on it beforehand.

Final month, Armstrong’s attorneys mentioned the bigger doping tradition within the sport is related as a result of Armstrong’s conduct “didn’t happen in a vacuum, nor did the USPS’ present expressions of shock and shock that there was doping on their biking crew.”

They are saying the federal government’s assertions that Armstrong triggered the crew to dope and submit false claims are usually not true and the bigger state of biking helps present that.

If the federal government wins, it might get its a refund instances three beneath the False Claims Act – almost $100 million. Armstrong may very well be on the hook for all of it, however his attorneys have vigorously contested the federal government’s case, particularly the notion that the Postal Service suffered damages due to the biking crew’s doping.

“It is just honest for Armstrong to reply by demonstrating that it was the whole thing of the game that was ‘encouraging’ and ‘facilitating’ doping,” mentioned Armstrong’s attorneys on the agency Keker, Van Nest & Peters.

The federal government sees it in another way and likewise is making an attempt to exclude the testimony of John Gleaves, an professional on the historical past of doping who was employed by Armstrong’s authorized crew.

“Allowing Armstrong to parade this ‘everyone was doing it’ argument earlier than the jury would unduly prejudice the Plaintiffs as a result of it could mislead the jury into pondering that Armstrong must be given a cross for his (False Claims Act) violations as a result of a few of his rivals have been additionally doping,” mentioned the current submitting submitted by authorities attorneys, together with Chad Readler, performing assistant legal professional normal for the Civil Division of the Justice Division.

“However, even when ‘everyone’ else was doping, everyone else was not mendacity to the USPS about that doping whereas inducing USPS to resume a profitable sponsorship settlement.”

Armstrong doesn’t dispute his doping. He confessed to that on nationwide tv in 2013 – after greater than a decade of denials. As a substitute, he’s defending himself partially by saying the Postal Service acquired what it bargained for with the sponsorship and obtained way more in advantages and publicity than the $32.three million that was paid.

The case originated in 2010, when Armstrong’s teammate, Floyd Landis, filed a grievance in opposition to Armstrong beneath seal in federal court docket. The federal government joined Landis’ case in 2013, shortly after Armstrong’s doping confession. If the federal government’s case succeeds, Landis might stand up to 25% of recovered damages because the whistleblower who first introduced the case.

Autoplay

Present Thumbnails

Present Captions

Final SlideNext Slide